• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Join
  • Donate
  • Login

Saturday, July 18, 2026

Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn

The Jefferson Independent

The Jefferson Independent
The Jefferson Independent
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Interviews
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • The Tommyknocker
  • Media
  • About
  • Contact Us
    • Join Our Team
    • Submit an Article
    • Submit Feedback

‘Tariff-ic? or Tariff-ying,’ Event on Trump Administration’s Tariff Policy

by Micah Andrews April 18, 2025 in News 2 min read

0
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

On Monday, the Civil Discourse Initiative (“CDI”) hosted an event titled ‘Tariff-ic? or Tariff-ying,’ which featured a panel-style debate among three UVA undergraduates. Panelists Natasha Swindle, Ritvik Thakur, and Blake Boudreaux disagreed on the merits of the incoming tariff policy from the Trump administration.

CDI is a CIO founded by fourth-year Jack Siegel that promotes debate and discussion among various viewpoints, or in Jack’s words, combats “instincts against listening.” This event was no different, with Swindle and Thakur, both Economics Club members, warning against tariffs and Boudreaux, President of UVA College Republicans, championing pro-tariff sentiment. 

The tariff theme is incredibly timely. Just five days before the debate, President Donald Trump unveiled his plan for “reciprocal tariffs” placed on more than 180 countries and territories. In addition to these tariffs, the Trump administration announced a 10% baseline tariff on all countries regardless of trade deficit—leaving much policy to discuss.

Siegel began by asking what each of the three thought about tariffs as a tool for trade policy. Boudreaux argued that free trade is bad for the United States because it allows exploitation from other countries, creating massive US trade deficits and moving the manufacturing industry abroad. At the same time, Thakur claimed that the “United States needs to be a beacon of free trade” to enable all countries involved in trade to benefit from specialization, while Swindle pointed out that domestic retailers will not bear the burden of taxes themselves and will likely pass through these costs to consumers. 

Although each camp, pro- and anti-tariff, disagreed on the best way to achieve economic prosperity for the United States, the discussion remained respectful. Panelists found common ground in their desire to limit uncertainty as the country rolls out new international trade legislation by maintaining a consistent and stable approach. Such peaceful discourse emulated the principles of CDI to break barriers in dialogue, fostering peaceful and insightful discussions.

Tags: featured News policy tariffs trump

Read Next Your Life Isn’t a Movie

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Get The Jeff in Your Inbox

Trending Articles

01 Are We Building Toward Another World War? Yale History Professor Draws Parallels to WWI

02 General Assembly in Action: Affordability

03 General Assembly in Action: Gun Control

04 Blue Ridge Center Panelists Discuss Youth Voter Gender Gap, Politics In The Internet Age

05 Center for Politics Hosts Ambassador of Jordan

Footer

The Jefferson Independent

Site Navigation

  • About
  • Join
  • Donate
  • Login

Social Media

Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn

© 2026 The Jefferson Independent

  • News
  • Opinion
  • Interviews
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • The Tommyknocker
  • Media
  • About
  • Contact Us
    • Join Our Team
    • Submit an Article
    • Submit Feedback
Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn